Signature Bank, another bank in that sort of midsized region, which also had, similar to Silicon Valley Bank, some exposures to interest rates and a lot of customers over the $250,000 Federal Deposit Insurance limit, also collapsed a few days later. So the customers pulled out their money in droves. It had to sell a bunch of investments that had lost value as interest rates rose. So Silicon Valley, as you’ll remember, had planned pretty poorly for rising interest rates. I think that what happened at First Republic was sort of a slow-motion reaction to what happened at Silicon Valley Bank, that first bank that failed.

So tell us about why first Republic Bank ultimately went under. And it was even bigger as a bank than the previous two that failed. In fact, a third bank, First Republic Bank, collapsed. And after these two banks had failed, Silicon Valley Bank, then a couple of days later Signature Bank, the hope, and I’d say the expectation, was that this crisis might be over. So, Jeanna, another day, another bank failure. Today, I speak with my colleague, Jeanna Smialek, about whether we’re at the end of this banking crisis or the start of a new phase of financial pain. On Monday morning, the federal government took over a third failing bank, this time, First Republic. michael barbaroįrom “The New York Times,” I’m Michael Barbaro. Please review the episode audio before quoting from this transcript and email with any questions.

While it has been reviewed by human transcribers, it may contain errors. This transcript was created using speech recognition software. Now What? The seizing of First Republic by regulators could signal the end of the banking crisis.

Till we have faces meaning